We owe them everything. If you are too comfortable in you peaceful home and city to recognize that, then you need to stop writing any old bit of drivel that slips out of your mind and start reading about our country's history. We have the liberty that we do because our fathers and forefathers were willing to sacrifice their lives and comfort to provide it for us. If you can't recognize why you live in such peace and comfort, you should be strapped to the front of a Humvee and taken on a tour of Iraq."These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President's handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect.
"But it is the United States, and the recent NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary - oops sorry, volunteer - force that thinks it is doing the dirty work."
Through every Abu Ghraib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform, accepting that the incidents were the product of bad apples or even of some administration or command order."
"America needs to ponder what it is we really owe those in uniform."
Anyway, his response to all of the abuse (obviously only written and verbal, which is better than he deserves) that he has received is as arrogant and ignorant as his first article.
"These men and women are not fighting for money with little regard for the nation. The situation might be much worse than that: Evidently, far too many in uniform believe that they are the one true nation. They hide behind the constitution and the flag and then spew an anti-Democrat, anti-liberal, anti-journalism, anti-dissent, and anti-citizen message that reflects a certain contempt for the American people."How dare he talk like he and his ilk are "the American people." Just because polls say that the majority of Americans are not happy with the war and the way it is being handled, doesn't mean that they hold is cowardly, anti-military opinions. I'm very comfortable that more Americans would agree with me than him.
"Again, I understand the frustration of those in uniform and the supporters of the war. But these are not the only people who have a valid opinion, and there is great danger for the nation - as Bush-Cheney and company have already demonstrated - when people arrogate to themselves the sole determinant to make a judgment about national security."It seems to me that there was an election in November of 2004 in which the majority of the American people gave President Bush, as Commander-in-Chief, the authority to make the final decisions on national security. That doesn't mean his decisions will always be popular with all, or even a majority of Americans, but he certainly didn't "arrogate" the authority to himself. Children, or the childish, do not always agree with the decisions their parents make in trying to care for and protect them but that does not make the parents wrong.
Mr. Arkin complains that he should be allowed to have voice his opinion without being criticized for it but if his opinion hurts our nation or it soldiers, as it truly does, then he needs to keep it to himself or at least he needs to refrain from spewing it into the public square. We revere freedom of speech in this country, but sometimes irresponsible freedom of speech should result in consequences or the irresponsible party. In the very least, Mr. Arkin should find himself in the position of seeking another source of employment, but of course, the Washington Post probably will not do anything about him.
Update: A new post by the arrogant one.
"Note: On the advice of my editors, this is the last column I will post for awhile on this subject."
